Executive summary. CMS’s CY 2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) final rule nudged rates and reaffirmed PDGM-era expectations for productivity, documentation quality, and measurable outcomes. The headline behavioral adjustment landed at 1.975%, smaller than what was proposed, but still meaningful in agencies with thin operating discipline. The agencies that maintain margin in 2026 won’t be those that “find” a few basis points in billing; they’ll be the ones that systematize HR, compensation, scheduling, and compliance so care teams can perform without friction and audits don’t create costly rework.
Content
- What actually changed, and why operators should care
- The margin story is now a people-systems story
- Turn policy into practice: a workforce operating system for 2026
- Planning under uncertainty: three scenarios to war-game
- Benchmarking the industry narrative (and why you should be cautious)
- A 60-day action sequence to operationalize
- Closing thought
- Frequently Asked Questions
1) What actually changed, and why operators should care
On November 1, 2024, CMS issued the CY 2025 HH PPS final rule, later published in the Federal Register. Among other items, the rule finalized the permanent behavioral adjustment at –1.975%, updated case-mix calibrations, and addressed rate mechanics for specific items such as IVIG and dNPWT devices. CMS also followed with a correction notice (CMS-1803-CN) to clean up technical items, small on paper, but a reminder that your internal policies must be version-controlled and traceable to the final and corrected rules your teams actually operate under.
Parallel to payment policy, the expanded Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) model continues to influence how agencies prioritize improvement work. HHVBP’s measure and reporting cadence create real financial consequences tied to OASIS, claims-based outcomes, and HHCAHPS, meaning your people systems (hiring, training, supervision, documentation support) now directly shape your revenue curve. In 2025, CMS communications and industry clinical education highlighted updates and reminders for HHVBP and the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HHQRP), reinforcing that clinical quality, patient experience, and documentation precision are not “nice-to-haves”, they are payment variables.
Finally, labor risk remains elevated. The U.S. Department of Labor’s 2025 Field Assistance Bulletin specific to the home care sector sharpened enforcement posture on travel time, overtime, and classification. Even if your home health line is clinically distinct from personal care, the pay-practice and timekeeping standards WHD enforces travel with workers across your enterprise. In short: wage-and-hour accuracy is now an essential element of revenue protection.
2) The margin story is now a people-systems story
Payment rates set the frame, but variance lives in the workflow. When you parse underperformance in agencies that look similar on paper, the root causes are usually human-systems issues that compound quietly:
- Unclear compensation logic that unintentionally rewards the wrong behaviors (e.g., visit count without regard to documentation completeness).
- Scheduling volatility that drives avoidable overtime, missed visits, and early turnover in the first 90 days.
- Timekeeping-to-payroll leakage (missed punches, manual edits, or inconsistent capture of drive time and mileage), which breeds distrust and invites disputes.
- Credential and training gaps that suddenly become survey findings, or worse, cause claims denials because the documentation trail doesn’t line up.
In other words, your payroll ledger is a downstream readout of HR design decisions. The CY 2025 final rule didn’t create those dynamics; it made them more visible because there’s less room to hide slippage.
3) Turn policy into practice: a workforce operating system for 2026
Below is a pragmatic blueprint agencies can implement over one to two quarters. It’s purposefully cross-functional, finance, HR, clinical ops, and revenue cycle must run the same playbook.
A. Rebuild compensation around outcomes and reality, not titles
Start by mapping your actual care patterns: visit types, average drive time by geography, expected documentation minutes, and supervisory touchpoints. Use that map to redesign pay in three layers:
- Base pay rules that reflect the true job (per-visit, hourly, or hybrid), explicitly accounting for drive time and mileage under applicable state and federal rules.
- Differentials and premiums that are narrow and intentional, nights, weekends, high-scarcity skills, so overtime doesn’t balloon from broad “catch-all” add-ons.
- Quality-aligned incentives keyed to HHVBP-relevant outcomes and documentation completeness (e.g., timeliness and accuracy of OASIS elements), so the things CMS measures are the same things caregivers feel rewarded to deliver.
A word on earned wage access and other liquidity tools: they can stabilize retention if framed with education and budget guardrails, but they are not a substitute for sound base pay. Use them to remove short-term stress, not to paper over structural gaps in the model.
B. Treat scheduling as a retention program with a cost outcome
High-performing agencies professionalize scheduling. That means:
- Predictable weekly templates for core routes to reduce last-minute reshuffles.
- A float pool with defined rules of engagement (who is in it, what they cover, how much notice triggers a differential).
- Early-tenure stabilization: pair new clinicians with a preceptor, cap daily visit complexity in week one, and use 30-/60-/90-day check-ins to catch burnout.
When scheduling is stable, overtime falls, turnover decelerates, and HHVBP outcomes improve, because clinicians aren’t sprinting from one fire to the next.
C. Close the “time → payroll → billing → audit” loop
Map one end-to-end data lineage, from the moment a visit is scheduled to the day a claim is dropped and an auditor could reconstruct it. Your goal is single-source-of-truth alignment:
- The same visit record should support pay calculations, supervision attestations, and claims data.
- Exceptions (missing signatures, out-of-window visits, expired credentials) should surface before payroll runs or claims drop.
- Access controls should make it obvious who changed what and when, because investigation time is money when a payer or surveyor asks questions.
This sounds technical, but it is fundamentally an HR discipline question: reliable identities, roles, competencies, and schedules are HR assets that make the revenue cycle trustworthy. The CY 2025 final rule’s publication and subsequent correction notice are your cue to ensure your internal SOPs reflect final-final requirements, not last year’s binder.
D. Make wage-and-hour compliance boring (that’s a compliment)
With WHD’s 2025 guidance for home care on the books, tighten three things:
- Drive time and mileage capture: standardize the method; avoid manual “notes fields” that later become disputes.
- Edits governance: if managers fix missed punches, require short, specific reasons and preserve the digital trail.
- Role boundaries: where staff work across home health and personal care, make sure classification and pay rules don’t drift with the schedule.
Compliance work has a direct ROI: fewer corrections, fewer grievances, and a defensible posture if WHD comes knocking.
E. Train to the measures you’re paid on
OASIS proficiency and HHVBP awareness should be part of your annual competency cycle, not a one-off in-service. Build a small curriculum that connects clinical scenarios to the exact fields and measures that drive your outcomes, and publish scoreboards managers can coach from. CMS’s HHVBP updates and QRP communications are clear: the program is mature enough that “learning the measures” is core job knowledge, not specialty trivia.
4) Planning under uncertainty: three scenarios to war-game
Scenario 1: Flat-to-slight pressure. The –1.975% behavioral adjustment sticks; HHVBP remains a swing factor. Objective: capture margin in operations. Action: lock compensation rules, stabilize schedules, and cut avoidable overtime through float design. Metrics: OT% below target, first-year turnover, documentation completeness.
Scenario 2: Mixed payer drag. Medicare FFS holds, but Medicare Advantage and Medicaid rates trail inflation; utilization management tightens. Objective: protect cash conversion. Action: accelerate denial prevention by linking timekeeping, credentialing, and documentation to pre-billing checks; re-negotiate MA under a data-driven story of outcomes. Metrics: initial denial rate, rework hours per 100 visits, days to credential remediation.
Scenario 3: Heightened enforcement. Wage-and-hour investigations tick up locally. Objective: be audit-ready by design. Action: run an internal mock WHD audit on three employees from application → scheduling → time capture → payroll → proof of payment; fix gaps before they become penalties. Metrics: exception rate per payroll, percent of shifts with verified drive time, edit-without-reason rate.
5) Benchmarking the industry narrative (and why you should be cautious)
You will see conflicting stories about home health “margins.” For example, MedPAC’s data book series has shown positive Medicare margins for freestanding agencies in earlier years (e.g., 2021–2022), a view many operators challenge as too narrow because it excludes payer mix realities and the cost of recent payment cuts. The point isn’t who’s right; it’s that your variance is controllable and largely HR-driven. Build budgets from your own productivity, turnover, and rework math, not from national averages that may not reflect your market or payer mix.
6) A 60-day action sequence to operationalize
- Weeks 1–2: Final-rule reconciliation. Update your internal policy manual to the CY 2025 final + correction notice; circulate a redlined change log managers must initial.
- Weeks 2–4: Compensation deep-dive. Re-cost schedules with real drive times and documentation minutes; narrow differentials; document rules for mixed-setting staff.
- Weeks 3–6: Scheduling redesign. Stand up templates and a float pool; set service-level targets (e.g., next-day coverage probability by discipline).
- Weeks 4–7: Wage-and-hour controls. Implement edit-reason codes, drive-time standards, and a weekly exception report sent to HR and Payroll.
- Weeks 5–8: Quality-linked training. Launch micro-lessons tying OASIS fields to HHVBP measures; publish a manager dashboard of documentation timeliness and accuracy.
Closing thought
Compliance and workforce design used to be “supporting actors” in home health. Under PDGM and HHVBP, they are now profit centers. Agencies that set clear pay rules, stabilize schedules, align training with measured outcomes, and keep a tight audit trail will feel the CY 2025 rule as a set of constraints to optimize within, not an existential threat.
Are CMS Changes Putting Your Agency at Risk?
CMS reimbursement changes affect more than revenue, they can impact staffing, scheduling, and compliance. As margins tighten, small HR gaps can quickly create risk. This guide outlines what’s changing, while a short HR risk assessment helps determine whether your agency is prepared before issues escalate.
Start My Free HR Risk Check →Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What reimbursement changes are proposed for home health in 2025?
A: CMS proposed a 4.067% reduction in the home health payment rate for Calendar Year 2025, along with updates to case-mix, outlier payments, and utilization thresholds as part of the Home Health Prospective Payment System.
Q: How do cuts to Medicare reimbursement affect home health agencies?
A: Reductions tighten financial margins, making it harder to offer competitive wages and benefits. This impacts your ability to recruit and retain staff and may strain operations without proactive workforce and payroll strategies.
Q: What is PBJ reporting and why is it important?
A: Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) reporting is a CMS requirement that tracks staffing data for compliance and quality reporting. Agencies must submit accurate payroll and timekeeping data, and misalignment can trigger compliance issues.
Q: How can improved payroll and HR systems help my home health business?
A: Integrated payroll + timekeeping + billing systems streamline compliance, reduce administrative burden, and protect against wage and hour risks, freeing you to focus on caregiving quality.
Q: What steps can home health agencies take right now?
A: Evaluate compensation strategies, invest in retention, improve HR compliance, unify systems, and stay abreast of reporting changes (e.g., PBJ and OASIS updates).
Proposed CMS changes can impact staffing models, scheduling, and compliance.
Talk through your options with an HR expert before small issues become costly problems.
If you need help with workforce management, please contact PeopleWorX at 240-699-0060 | 1-888-929-2729 or email us at HR@peopleworx.io
